1. Prepare procurement
Assess whether to apply the clauses
Before each procurement, you need to decide whether the due diligence contract clauses shall be applied.
The regions and Adda Central Purchasing Body work systematically with this type of assessment, but in different ways:
The Regions’ National Secretariat for Sustainable Public Procurement regularly reviews all purchasing categories to identify in which categories the risk of adverse impact is most likely and most severe. For these so-called prioritised purchasing categories, the contract clauses shall always be applied.
For other purchasing categories, the regions need to conduct their own assessments.
Adda Central Purchasing Body conducts a 2030 Agenda analysis prior to each procurement, where the relevance of due diligence requirements is assessed based on supply chain risks. The industry’s maturity and ability to meet the requirements, as well as the need for any additional requirements, are also assessed.
Procurement legislation
If Swedish labour law does not apply to the supply chain, you may in some cases be obliged to require the supplier to fulfill the contract in accordance with the ILO fundamental conventions, if necessary.
Labour law conditions in the procurement rules (external Swedish link)
ILO Fundamental Conventions
The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the UN’s expert body for employment and labour issues. The ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work commits member states to respect and promote these principles and rights, even if they have not ratified the fundamental conventions. The fundamental conventions are ten in number and cover five areas:
- freedom of association and collective bargaining (ILO 87 and 98)
- forced labour (ILO 29 and 105)
- child labour (ILO 138 and 182)
- discrimination in employment (ILO 100 and 111)
- safe and healthy working environment (ILO 155 and ILO 187).
The requirements must also be proportionate, in line with the fundamental principles of procurement.
The fundamental principles of procurement (external Swedish link)
In practice, this means that you need to weigh the supply chain risks against the market conditions. In industries dominated by small players or where sustainability maturity is low, the requirements may need to be adapted.
Assess the regions’ other purchasing categories
We have developed a template that you can use to determine whether it is necessary and proportionate to impose due diligence requirements in the regions’ other purchasing categories.
The template takes into account the supply chain risks, supplier size and the industry’s sustainability maturity.
[template coming soon]
In the template, you use our country risks.
Engage in dialogue with suppliers about the challenges and abilities of the industry. Structural challenges, such as a lack of traceability, can make the work more complex. At the same time, industry and multi-stakeholder initiatives, certifications and standards can indicate a high level of sustainability maturity, even if the work is complex.
Early dialogue (external Swedish link)
It is also important to make use of information from previous contracts. Contracting organisations should avoid burdening suppliers with questions if the information is already available. This is a way to put the principle of shared responsibility into practice.
If the standard requirements are considered disproportionate, you can use the basic requirements, but remember that for the regions’ prioritised purchasing categories, the standard contract clauses shall always be used.
Services
For services performed in Sweden, it may be relevant to set labour law conditions according to collective agreements (salary, working hours, leave). At the same time, many services have international supply chains. For example may:
- materials in construction and civil engineering services,
- or input goods in other services
originate in countries with higher risk.
In these cases, it may be justified to set requirements for both:
- due diligence for sustainable supply chains, and
- labour law conditions according to collective agreements.
Finalise the contract clauses
As a buyer, you need to complete and finalise the contract clauses. Placeholders such as [contracting organisation] shall be replaced with relevant information. Once the contract clauses are complete, they shall be included in their entirety in the procurement documents to ensure transparency.
Deadlines
The contract clauses contain recommended deadlines, in square brackets, for:
- Supplier’s reporting obligation (clause 3)
- Dialogue (clause 4.2)
- Self-assessment (clause 4.3)
- Supply chain transparency (clause 4.4)
- Audit (clause 4.5.1)
- Action plan (clause 5.2)
Through dialogue meetings, requests for information (RFI) and referrals, you can collect valuable information and, if necessary, adapt the deadlines to the specific procurement.
Dialogue meetings with suppliers (external Swedish link)
Request for information (RFI) and external referral (external Swedish link)
Supply chain transparency
Contract clause
Supplier shall, within [four (4)] weeks of [contracting organisation’s] request, provide a written account of the sub-suppliers Supplier uses to fulfil the contract. This includes the legal names and physical addresses of:
- final manufacturing facilities for [product/products/assortment]
- [manufacturing facilities one (1) tier beyond] final manufacturing of [the product/products/assortment]
- [manufacturing facilities for [component/components] in [product/products/assortment]
- [smelters/refineries for the tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold (3TG), cobalt and mica] used in [product/products/assortment]
- [the origin of [raw material] used in [product/products/assortment]
- [extraction facilities for [raw material] used in [the product/products/assortment]
The transparency requirement means that the supplier, upon request, must report which sub-suppliers are used to fulfill the contract, including legal names and physical addresses. Transparency is different from traceability, which refers to the ability to track materials and products through each stage of production.
The first bullet of the clause, on final manufacturing facilities, is a minimum level. Specify whether the requirement shall apply to a specific product, all products or an entire assortment. Other levels, indicated in square brackets, shall only be used if it is proportionate based on the complexity, risks and maturity of the industry.
In order to be able to make this assessment, you need to ensure, through dialogue meetings, RFIs and referrals, what the suppliers can actually deliver. If this is not done, there is a risk that the requirements will become disproportionate, which in turn may lead to suppliers refraining from submitting tenders or the procurement being challenged.
Dialogue meetings with suppliers (external Swedish link)
Request for information (RFI) and external referral (external Swedish link)
At the same time, the situation is changing rapidly with new EU legislation making more information available for certain raw materials and products. This applies, for example, to the origin of cobalt, graphite, lithium and nickel in batteries under the Battery Regulation, the origin of cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy and wood under the Deforestation Regulation, and the origin of materials, such as silicon, in high-risk forced labour products under the Forced Labour Regulation. In these cases, more far-reaching requirements can often be proportionate, as the information is already available or is about to become available in the supply chains.
The Regions’ National Secretariat for Sustainable Public Procurement has developed recommended levels for the transparency requirement for certain products in prioritised purchasing categories. These levels are considered proportionate.
The recommendations are available in our criteria library.
If there is no national recommendation for a prioritised purchasing category and you are not able to assess the complexity, risks and maturity of the industry yourself, the transparency requirement should be limited to the minimum level, i.e. final manufacturing facilities. The requirement shall apply to all products or the entire assortment. This is considered proportionate because all suppliers should know where their products are manufactured. Other levels, indicated in square brackets, shall be removed. The provision can be used in contract templates.
Increased demands for security of supply also change the conditions, but do not set separate requirements in other parts of the procurement. Instead, ensure that all relevant products, components and raw materials are included in the transparency requirement in the due diligence contract clauses.
For support on how the transparency requirement can be applied in the supply chains for electronics and electric cars, see the presentation from Electronics Watch.
For information on how to monitor the transparency requirement, see Manage contract.
Liquidated damages
Contract clause
If Supplier does not report in accordance with section 3, does not participate in monitoring in accordance with section 4, fails to take action in accordance with sections 5.1 – 5.2 or does not address deviations in accordance with the established action plan, [contracting organisation] has the right to impose a liquidated damage on Supplier. Liquidated damages amount to [_ SEK, excluding VAT] per commenced week the circumstances persist. The liquidated damage may be imposed for a maximum of [_ weeks].
The contract clauses contain a liquidated damages provision to ensure that the supplier takes the necessary measures. A liquidated damage is a predetermined compensation for deviations from the contract clauses. For the buyer, the liquidated damage provision simplifies the handling of sanctions, while providing the supplier with clarity about any costs in the event of deviations. You determine the amount of the liquidated damage based on what is appropriate for the specific procurement, taking into account the subject-matter of procurement and the contract value.
Prioritise risks
In-depth risk assessments are used to understand and prioritise risks in the supply chain of a specific purchasing category or product. They form a basis for which additional requirements should be set, as well as to determine which materials and components may be relevant for the supply chain transparency requirement. The risk assessments can also be used as background information in the monitoring of the contract clauses, both during audits and incident management.
Preferably, the risk assessments are developed in dialogue with the industry concerned. It is also important to take into account information from previous contracts, in order to put the principle of shared responsibility into practice.
We have developed risk assessments for a number of high-risk products.
The Swedish National Agency for Public Procurement and the Norwegian Directorate for Public Administration and Management also offer risk analyses for a number of products:
Supply chain risk analyses (external Swedish link)
High-risk list (external Norwegian link)
You can also map supply chains and identify and assess adverse impacts yourself. As support, you can use the e-learnings we have developed for suppliers. If you use the templates provided in the e-learnings and engage in dialogue and share the results with suppliers, they will at the same time meet process requirement 2: Identify and assess adverse impacts for the product in question. This is another way to put the principle of shared responsibility into practice.

Map Your Supply Chains
Do you want to learn how to map your supply chains?
Spend 15 minutes on our training.

Identify & Assess Adverse Impacts
Do you want to learn how to identify and assess adverse impacts?
Spend 20 minutes on our training.
Develop additional requirements
The due diligence contract clauses shall be fulfilled at contract execution, not when submitting a tender. Unless otherwise stated, they come into force when the contract comes into force.
In addition to the due diligence contract clauses, there may therefore be a need for additional requirements. When different requirements are used in a coordinated manner, they can strengthen the conditions for the suppliers’ work.
Suppliers within the same industry often differ in maturity. Some lack basic processes, while others are actively applying due diligence.
Qualification requirements can be used to exclude suppliers who do not meet a minimum level, while award criteria can reward suppliers who have come further, for example with traceability or measures linked to prioritised risks. In this way, procurement can contribute to gradually raising the level throughout the industry.
Here too, dialogue with suppliers is crucial, especially via Request for Information (RFI) and external referral.
Dialogue meetings with suppliers (external Swedish link)
Request for information (RFI) and external referral (external Swedish link)
Qualification requirements
In practice, only yes/no questions about accepting due diligence contract clauses are often used. Such questions provide limited information about the technical and professional capacity of the supplier and are not an effective selection instrument. As a complement, you can use qualification requirements that focus on policies and processes.
Supplier qualification (external Swedish link)
The aim is not to reward the best suppliers, but to ensure that public contracts are not awarded to operators without basic risk management. A proportionate design – for example, a focus on the existence of policies and processes rather than an evaluation of their effectiveness – helps to keep the resource consumption of contracting organisations down and lower the threshold for SMEs.
This is also the starting point for how the City of Oslo applies its qualification requirements.
| Requirement | Document requirement |
|---|---|
| The Supplier shall be suitable to fulfil the contract requirements relating to due diligence for responsible business conduct under [insert the clause in the contract corresponding to the contract requirement]. This means that the Supplier has implemented measures and systems used in the Supplier’s operations to safeguard fundamental human rights and decent working conditions, and to prevent environmental damage and corruption. | EA description of the Supplier’s systems for working with due diligence in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. The documentation shall include: – Formal policies/guidelines that include a commitment to comply with requirements for responsible business conduct. -Formal policies/guidelines on responsibility for subcontractors/the supply chain (Supplier Code of Conduct). This shall only be submitted if subcontractors are used. – Descriptions of the Supplier’s processes and routines for how the business works with due diligence. – A description of how the Supplier will obtain and maintain an overview of countries of origin and production sites for the goods offered by the Supplier. This shall only be submitted if the procurement includes goods. |
Award criteria
Award criteria play a central role in creating incentives for improvement. In many procurements today, award criteria that clearly distinguish suppliers based on their due diligence are missing – which means that investments do not always have an impact in the evaluation.
Basis for evaluation (external Swedish link)
Well-designed award criteria can be used to reward suppliers that have made further progress in their work with traceability and transparency, that have taken measures linked to prioritised risks – such as forced labour, child labour or living wages – or that participate in credible industry or multi-stakeholder initiatives, provided that equivalent solutions are allowed. Below are examples of how Dutch contracting organisations have set requirements:
Fairly produced coffee (external Dutch link)
Responsibly produced stone (external Dutch link)
If sustainability criteria are given low weight in the evaluation of tenders, they will have limited effect and risk being treated as a marginal price adjustment rather than a strategic incentive. A higher weight creates clearer drivers for suppliers to develop their work. Within this share, space should be allocated for both environmental and social criteria, to avoid environmental aspects crowding out work on human rights.
In many contracting organisations, focus is still on environmental criteria. At the same time, the risks linked to human rights and, above all, workers’ rights are increasing. The EU Forced Labor Regulation will apply from December 2027, which means that goods suspected of being produced using forced labor can be stopped at the border. This in turn could affect the security of supply of critical goods such as medical gloves.
Labels
In some cases, you may require labels in the procurement documents.
Label requirements may be set out in the technical specifications, in the award criteria or in the contract clauses.
There are many different labels, and they vary in scope, focus and quality. Often a label means that a third party verifies that a good or service meets certain criteria, but labels do not always cover the entire supply chain and are not always verified by a third party. Labels sometimes also focus on either environmental or social aspects, and are therefore not always directly comparable or “equivalent”.
Example bananas
The EU Organic Logo ensures environmental considerations in the cultivation of bananas, but does not include requirements for working conditions. KRAV includes, in addition to environmental requirements, also requirements for working conditions. However, none of these labels regulate the price paid to growers.
Fairtrade differs by also requiring minimum prices and premiums, which directly address the growers’ incomes and financial conditions to ensure fair working conditions. The labels thus complement each other by covering different sustainability aspects.
In Sweden, the Fairtrade bananas sold are organic, which means that contracting organisations do not have to choose between organic and Fairtrade. However, the requirements need to be clear.
Investigate whether there are industry initiatives working towards better conditions in the supply chain. Such initiatives can save both time and resources and contribute to industry-wide improvements.
Despite this, labels can be a useful complement in procurement, especially when used consciously and in combination with other requirements and tools.
Rules for the use of certifications (external Swedish link)
Use of certifcations (external Swedish link)
Examples of lables can be found in the Swedish National Agency for Public Procurement’s risk analysis service.
Information about final manufacturing country
Ensure that templates for price lists and statistics contain specific fields for the country of final manufacturing and factory addresses, and that filling in this information is mandatory for the supplier.
The information makes it possible to select relevant samples during office audits, based on where the risks of adverse impact are greatest. It also facilitates the monitoring of adverse impacts in the supply chain (incidents), for example if a severe adverse impact is linked to a specific region or production site.
The information also strengthens security of supply. In the event of disruptions, such as conflicts or natural disasters, you can more quickly identify affected suppliers and manage consequences in the supply chain.
A free tool you can use to visualise your supply chains is Open Supply Hub. For a fee, you can embed the map on your website.
The regions’ shared sustainability requirements and associated guidance can be found in our criteria library.
Ensure responsible purchasing practices
In addition to requirements and criteria, your own choices also affect the conditions in the supply chain.
Pricing, delivery times, volume predictability (e.g. framework agreements versus contracts) and payment terms are key factors. For example, low prices or tight deadlines can increase the risk of adverse impact.
Responsible purchasing practices are therefore about designing commercial terms that enable compliance.
For more information on responsible purchasing practices, see the Responsible Purchasing Practices Working Group.
PAGE CONTENT
Assess whether to apply the clauses
Assess the regions’ other purchasing categories
Develop additional requirements
Ensure responsible purchasing practices
RELATED LINKS BUYERS
RELATED LINKS SUPPLIERS
3. Supplier’s reporting obligation
PROCESS REQUIREMENTS DUE DILIGENCE
1. Policies and responsibilities
3. Prevent and mitigate (causation/contribution)